Britain’s royals and the Nazis: complex echoes of history

0
Buckingham Palace said it was disappointed about images published by the Sun newspaper showing Queen Elizabeth II giving a Nazi salute as a young child in the 1930s -© AFP/File / by Katherine Haddon

Buckingham Palace said it was disappointed about images published by the Sun newspaper showing Queen Elizabeth II giving a Nazi salute as a young child in the 1930s -© AFP/File / by Katherine Haddon

LONDON: Footage of Queen Elizabeth II giving a Nazi salute as a child on Sunday revived an uncomfortable debate about the British royal family’s historic links to Adolf Hitler’s murderous regime in Germany.

The queen was still princess Elizabeth, aged around six, when the black-and-white home movie released by The Sun newspaper was shot in 1933 or 1934 and could not have known the significance of the “Heil Hitler” salute.

The video shows her uncle, the future king Edward VIII, encouraging her as well as her mother and sister. He is a more compromised figure, with many historians accusing him of being sympathetic to the Nazi regime.

After years of overtures, Edward met Hitler in Germany in 1937. This followed his abdication as king in 1936 after less than a year on the throne over his desire to marry American divorcee Wallis Simpson.

The Nazis later hatched an unsuccessful plot, codenamed “Operation Willi”, to kidnap Edward in 1940 and reinstall him as king if Germany invaded Britain during World War II.

“His behaviour was part of a pattern, the duke dancing around the fringes of disloyalty and duplicity but never quite committing,” royal expert Andrew Morton wrote in “17 Carnations”, a book about Edward and the Nazis published this year.

“Like a flirt in a nightclub, the duke suggested much but delivered very little.”

Many European aristocrats initially saw Hitler as a bulwark against the communist regime in Russia, which in 1917 deposed tsar Nicholas II, who was executed a year later.

 

– Monarchy rebuilt during WWII –

 

After Edward’s abdication, which caused the biggest scandal in modern royal history, he was ostracised by the rest of the family, which has German roots dating back to the early 18th century.

Edward’s brother, Queen Elizabeth II’s father, took the throne, becoming king George VI.

The new king did not always find royal life easy — his struggle to overcome a stammer was depicted in the 2010 Oscar-winning film “The King’s Speech”.

But he and his wife, the queen’s mother, did a lot to rebuild the monarchy’s reputation during World War II by staying at Buckingham Palace during German air raids known as The Blitz and visiting bomb sites.

After the palace was hit in 1940, the queen reportedly said: “I’m glad we have been bombed. Now I can look the east end (of London, the worst hit area) in the face.”

The then 18-year-old princess Elizabeth trained as a reserve mechanic and military truck driver.

Like much of the rest of the British establishment, the royal couple had supported the government’s policy of appeasement towards Germany, which lasted until early 1939.

This involved allowing Hitler to seize territory in the hope of keeping the peace.

 

– Queen’s ‘anger’ –

 

The Nazi salute footage seems to have caused embarrassment rather than significant damage to the widely respected and popular queen, although she is believed to be unamused.

“The royal family are like a prickly hedgehog with any reference to the Windsors and the Nazis,” Morton told AFP by email. “I am sure for once the phrase ‘queen’s fury’ is true.”

The wider public reaction has been more jokey memes on social media than outright condemnation.

Comedian Ricky Gervais posted a picture of himself as a child on Twitter with a side parting, writing: “Never mind The Queen, I actually looked like a tiny Hitler when I was 7.”

There was a similar reaction ten years ago when The Sun published a photograph of Prince Harry wearing a swastika armband to a friend’s fancy dress party.

The story has, though, increased pressure for the royal family’s tightly-controlled archives, from which the footage is thought to have leaked, to be opened up.

This would give the public the chance to understand in full the sometimes complex past of Britain’s royals, experts say.

“We should not be surprised to find that the history of the royal family in this period was not unlike that of others, committed to the folly of appeasement,” Karina Urbach, a historian at the University of London, wrote in Sunday’s Observer newspaper.

“But we should at least be able to follow the story in detail from within the royal archives.”

by Katherine Haddon -AFP