KUALA LUMPUR: Felda’s Finance Department was not aware that Felda Investment Corporation Sdn Bhd (FICSB)’s purchase of Merdeka Palace Hotel & Suites (MPHS) in Kuching, Sarawak, worth RM160 million, did not have the approval of its board of directors (BOD).
Former Felda finance director Mohd Shahrin Mohd Ali, 50, told the High Court here yesterday that an application from FICSB, a subsidiary of Felda, for an advance of RM1 million and RM1.88 million to purchase the hotel, made no mention of any approval for the deal.
The third prosecution witness, who is now Felda Transformation Unit director was testifying on the second day of the trial of former Felda chairman Tan Sri Mohd Isa Samad, who is facing charges of corruption and criminal breach of trust (CBT) involving RM3 million.
Asked by deputy public prosecutor Afzainizam Abdul Aziz whether it was really necessary for FICSB to seek the BOD’s approval on the purchase, in order to obtain the advance (money), Mohd Shahrin maintained that it was.
Afzainizam: Although advance has been given, approval still needs to be obtained?
Mohd Shahrin: Yes, because it concerns two different things; one is the approval for the (hotel) purchase and the second, approval for the advance payment.
The witness said Felda’s finance department would not have approved the advance payment to FICSB had it known that the purchase did not get the approval of the BOD.
“Based on the practice at the Felda finance department, if the approval is not obtained, we will usually discuss with the management before referring the matter to my superior, who is the Felda general manager or his deputy,” he said.
According to him, there were a number of investments that FICSB made without giving specific details to Felda’s finance department, because the subsidiary had its own management, Finance Department and BOD.
“I did not know about the hotel purchase until I was officially informed in 2015,” he said.
Mohd Shahrin said Felda’s finance department acknowledged the purchase but was not aware of the RM100 million investment limit that Felda was mandated to give FICSB.
“I came to know about the mandate on the RM100 million investment limit during the trial of a former Felda director involving a fish breeding project in 2017.” — Bernama